February 2, 2016
Focus
This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 2nd, 2016 at 8:42 am and posted in control. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
2 responses to “Focus”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Welcome to MONKEYTRAPS.
This is a blog about the oldest human addiction: control.
It’s co-authored by Steve, a therapist who specializes in control issues, and Bert, his control-addicted inner monkey.
(Bert is a metaphor. Steve’s mostly real.)
For a fuller explanation of what this is all about, click on CONTROL: AN INTRODUCTION and MEET MY MONKEY above.
Feedback welcome, always.
Glad you found us.
Steve & Bert

-
COMING SOON: An expanded 2nd edition

CLICK HERE TO ORDER MONKEYTRAPS (THE BOOK)

Follow the conversation:
-
Recent Posts
- Teacher
- About validation
- In time for Christmas.
- Power
- The two kinds of love
- The psychology of holes
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #10
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #9
- Why can’t I stop controlling?
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #8
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #7
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #6
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #5
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #4
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #3
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #2
- Ten essential rules of dysfunctional families: #1
- About psychological curses
- About hidden agonizing
- About hidden agony
Blog Stats
- 178,043 hits
Post archives
- October 2026 (3)
- September 2026 (12)
- August 2026 (13)
- July 2026 (17)
- June 2026 (22)
- May 2026 (27)
- April 2026 (26)
- April 2025 (1)
- April 2024 (1)
- March 2024 (17)
- February 2024 (13)
- January 2024 (8)
- December 2023 (15)
- November 2023 (31)
- October 2023 (31)
- September 2023 (27)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (2)
- August 2022 (5)
- January 2021 (1)
- November 2020 (6)
- October 2020 (9)
- September 2020 (7)
- July 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (5)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (6)
- February 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (2)
- August 2019 (3)
- July 2019 (4)
- September 2018 (5)
- August 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (7)
- February 2018 (7)
- January 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (3)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (2)
- August 2017 (4)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (6)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (6)
- February 2017 (9)
- January 2017 (8)
- December 2016 (4)
- November 2016 (7)
- October 2016 (6)
- September 2016 (12)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (8)
- June 2016 (7)
- May 2016 (11)
- April 2016 (9)
- March 2016 (22)
- February 2016 (19)
- January 2016 (11)
- December 2015 (21)
- November 2015 (16)
- October 2015 (11)
- September 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (6)
- March 2015 (11)
- February 2015 (13)
- January 2015 (16)
- December 2014 (16)
- November 2014 (15)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (17)
- August 2014 (29)
- July 2014 (21)
- June 2014 (20)
- May 2014 (23)
- April 2014 (21)
- March 2014 (10)
- February 2014 (12)
- April 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (2)
- December 2012 (6)
- November 2012 (12)
- October 2012 (13)
- September 2012 (17)
- August 2012 (10)
- July 2012 (7)
- June 2012 (11)
- May 2012 (10)
- April 2012 (9)
- March 2012 (8)
- February 2012 (9)
- January 2012 (10)
- December 2011 (8)
- November 2011 (9)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (9)
- August 2011 (8)
- July 2011 (10)
- June 2011 (9)
- May 2011 (9)
- April 2011 (9)
- March 2011 (2)
- August 2010 (3)
- July 2010 (7)
- June 2010 (4)
Monkeytraps archives
BERT’S IN THERAPY. To listen in, click on his nose.


February 10th, 2016 at 11:12 am
To me this is too black and white.
I’ve always thought that there was merit on both sides and that a balanced middle ground approach was best.
Some clear rules and expectations are a good thing. As is respect for one’s elders, saying please and thank you, writing thank you letters, and saying sorry when you make a mistake. Hygiene and teeth-brushing are important, as is learning to clean up after oneself and help out a bit around the house in the form of a weekly or daily chore. And some sort of discipline or consequence is generally a good idea as well. I think it is crucially important to begin nurturing the idea that many times when you choose the behavior you choose the consequence. “Parenting with Love and Logic” has a lot to offer regarding all of this.
If the above things are absent, children tend to become ungrateful, demanding, whiny, spoiled, and develop a sense of entitlement.
Of course all of this needs to be given with warmth, support, friendliness, unconditional positive regard, and love. Children need not just to listen, but to be listened to, to know that their parents are curious about them, want to get to know them, want to understand them. Children want to know that they are OK, loved, accepted, wanted
To me, both are needed. So what you presented is not an either or proposition, but a matter of taking the best of both approaches and combining it. I think both statements are perfectly ok statements: “I don’t like it when s/he does that” “Why does s/he do that?” And should be used together. Along with a clarifying question for oneself: “Why don’t I like it when s/he does that?” (For some parents it’s all about how their kids’ bad behavior makes the parents look, which means that the parents have issues to deal with. But if the answer isn’t about the parent but is about the child, then that is likely a good thing.)
And no two children are alike, so what applies to one may not work for another. So this is a huge part of the adventure of parenting, figuring out what makes each child tick, encouraging their uniqueness, and still cultivating pro-social behaviors, politeness, kindness, conscience, respect for others, self-control, cooperation, teeth-brushing, et cetera.
February 10th, 2016 at 11:44 am
Of course you’re right. It’s not either/or. Or at least it shouldn’t be.
But this post emerged from a series of meetings with parents for whom parenting was black and white, who tended to see empathy and discipline as somehow opposed to each other, and the former as subversive of the latter. Unsurprisingly, they were parented in this way themselves. The families that produced them were controlling, narcissistic, alcoholic, and in some cases abusive. As a result they grew up undervaluing their own feelings and the importance of empathy in relationships. And as adults their need to remain connected with their own parents — by, among other things, remaining “loyal” to an unempathic style of parenting — undermines their awareness of and sensitivity to what their own children need from then.
With such parents I do find it necessary to reframe parenting issues as a choice between two priorities, if only to make clear that an alternative to what they know is possible. Once they accept the importance of empathy we can move into integrating it with discipline.